|
#1 Posted 2:43pm 05-02-10 polynomial[image]40861106.jpg[/image]
Dont Mess With Che~! |
|
#2 Posted 4:11pm 05-02-10 Re: polynomialSeems to me that we cannot find such polynomials. We will use the fact that for sufficiently large magnitudes of x, the sign of P(x) coincides with the sign of the leading coefficient. For convenience I will write A instead of A(x). Let G = |A|-|B|+|C| There are two cases to be considered: I. A and C have the same signs for the leading coefficient. Then we see that [im]http://codecogs.izyba.com/gif.latex?G%28x%29%20%3D%20-G%28-x%29[/im] for sufficiently large magnitudes of x and this implies that [im]http://codecogs.izyba.com/gif.latex?%7CG%28x%29%7C%20%3D%20%7CG%28-x%29%7C[/im] But we get a contradiction here as [im]http://codecogs.izyba.com/gif.latex?x%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cinfty%20%5CRightarrow%20%7CG%28x%29%7C%20%5Crightarrow%20%5Cinfty[/im] and [im]http://codecogs.izyba.com/gif.latex?x%20%5Crightarrow%20-%5Cinfty%20%5CRightarrow%20%7CG%28x%29%7C%3D1[/im] 2. WLOG A and B have the same sign and leading coeff of C is -ve Then we get the equations A-B-C = -2x+2 -A+B+C = -1 which are true for infinitely many values of x so that C ≡ x + 3/2 contradicting that leading coefficient of C is -ve So no such polynomials A,B, C exist |
|
#3 Posted 4:36pm 05-02-10 Re: polynomial[im]http://latex.codecogs.com/gif.latex?\\%20\texttt{sir\:%20i\:%20dunno\:%20but%20\:ans\:%20given\:%20is\:\\%20}\\%20A(x)=\frac{3x+3}{2}\\%20B(x)=5x/2\\%20C(x)=-x%20+\frac{1}{2}%20\\[/im] [12]
Dont Mess With Che~! |
|
#4 Posted 9:05pm 05-02-10 Re: polynomialIf you take A,B, C as given by you, then for x> 1/2, you get |A(x)| = A(x), |B(x)| = B(x) and |C(x)| = x - 1/2 So, |A(x)|-|B(x)| + |C(x)| = 1. So the answer provided by you doesnt fulfil the conditions. |
|
#5 Posted 11:21pm 05-02-10 Re: polynomialhmm i guess u r rit then may be ans given is wrong !
Dont Mess With Che~! Edited on 11:22pm 05-02-10 |
|
#6 Posted 10:39am 07-02-10 Re: polynomialONe more observation, which i would like to put forward is this.. The nature of the function changes at the point where |A| or |B| or |C| is zero so we should definitely have 0 and 1 as the roots of a few of the given polynomials..... and the other roots should appear in multiples (if at all!) And that gives more reason for the given answer to be incorrect...
-when spring comes, it melts the snow one flake at a time… |
|
#7 Posted 0:56pm 07-02-10 Re: polynomialok thanx both of u :)
Dont Mess With Che~! |
|
#8 Posted 8:04pm 13-02-10 Re: polynomialthis prob actually has a printing mistake :P its shud be jus[b] C(x) instead of mod(C(x))[/b] got to know today that it is a PUTNAM 1999 prob i picked it from maths today.....and as usual it had a printing mistake.... i wont rely on maths today from now [16] check this http://www.math.hawaii.edu/home/putnam/1999.pdf
Dont Mess With Che~! |
