|
#1 Posted 0:47pm 18-03-09 SHM doubtsQ1. A small spherical ball of mass m and radius r rolls in a concave surface of radius R with sufficient friction. Find the time period of the resulting SHM. Q2. A body of mass m and specific gravity d(>1) floats in water. The temperature of both the body and the water is increased by T. The coefficient of linear expansion of the body is α and volume expansion of water is γ . (i) Find the initial time period. (ii) What is the new fraction of the body that is immersed in water at equilibrium (iii) What is the new time period in terms of the original time period?
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#2 Posted 1:07pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsAsish.. 1st one try Energy method :)
-when spring comes, it melts the snow one flake at a time… |
|
#3 Posted 1:10pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts:D mujhe laga hi tha... thats why i posted the FBD and then deleted it... bcuase i knew everyone will psot energy method... :D
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#4 Posted 1:11pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[image]12862092.jpg[/image]
http://skygirl-tete-a-tete.blogspot.com/
[phool bankar muskurana, zindagi hai...
muskurake gham bhulana, zindagi hai...
jeet kar koi khush ho toh kya hua?? ...
sab kuchh har kar khushiyaan manana, ZINDAGI hai... :) ] |
|
#5 Posted 1:12pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtstorque about the center of concave .....
http://skygirl-tete-a-tete.blogspot.com/
[phool bankar muskurana, zindagi hai...
muskurake gham bhulana, zindagi hai...
jeet kar koi khush ho toh kya hua?? ...
sab kuchh har kar khushiyaan manana, ZINDAGI hai... :) ] |
|
#6 Posted 1:13pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsWheres friction :P... :D
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#7 Posted 1:14pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts:D usko bhool gaye.......
http://skygirl-tete-a-tete.blogspot.com/
[phool bankar muskurana, zindagi hai...
muskurake gham bhulana, zindagi hai...
jeet kar koi khush ho toh kya hua?? ...
sab kuchh har kar khushiyaan manana, ZINDAGI hai... :) ] |
|
#8 Posted 1:15pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsarey woh lag jaega upar.... par energy method easy hai.....
http://skygirl-tete-a-tete.blogspot.com/
[phool bankar muskurana, zindagi hai...
muskurake gham bhulana, zindagi hai...
jeet kar koi khush ho toh kya hua?? ...
sab kuchh har kar khushiyaan manana, ZINDAGI hai... :) ] |
|
#9 Posted 1:16pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[b]v=rw w' = angular velocity of COM of sphere w'=v/(R-r)= rw/R-r dw'/dt=r/R-r dw/dt alpha'=ralpha/R-r alpha= a/r a= gsinx/ 1+I/mr[p]2[/p] a=5gsinx/7 alpha' = 5grsinx/R-r sinx=x alpha' = - 5grx/R-r t=2pi√x/alpha' T=2pi√(R-r)/5gr [/b]
cet on 12th may |
|
#10 Posted 1:16pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsyes bhaiya ... this is wat i did.. at any inst. mv[p]2[/p]/2 + Iω[p]2[/p]/2 + mg(R-r)(1-cosθ) = const. ==> mω[p]2[/p]r[p]2[/p]/2 + mr[p]2[/p]w[p]2[/p]/5 + mg(R-r)(1-cosθ) = const. ==> mωαr[p]2[/p] + 2ωαmr[p]2[/p]/5 + mgω(R-r)sinθ = 0 ==> αr[p]2[/p](7/5) = -g(R-r)θ ==> α = -(5/7)g(R-r)/r[p]2[/p]θ giving T = 2πr[sqrt]7/5g(R-r)[/sqrt] but ans is given as 2π[sqrt]7(R-r)/5g[/sqrt]
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#11 Posted 1:17pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsmgsinθ-f=ma fr=(2/5)mr[p]2[/p]α f=(2/5)ma ...a=αr put sinθ=θ mgθ-(2/5)ma=ma mgθ=(7/5)ma θ=x/(R-r) ...edited... this line :D a=(5/7)gx/(R-r) t=2pi[sqrt]7(R-r)/5g[/sqrt] [im]http://www.mylivesignature.com/signatures/54487/106/36F28B53D4635736C18695AB64D67B69.png[/im]
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 2:53pm 18-03-09 |
|
#12 Posted 1:17pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtssry amit ans is T = 2π√[o]7(R-r)/5g[/o]
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#13 Posted 1:22pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtspriyam... energy method me kahaan galti hua hai???
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#14 Posted 1:27pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsdekhte hain....energy method in SHM bhool gaye hainn ;)
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#15 Posted 1:27pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsyou have made a mistake in wr it is actually w(R-r)
-when spring comes, it melts the snow one flake at a time… |
|
#16 Posted 1:29pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[hide]v=ωr hi hoga..[/hide]. [b]confusion arose bcause there are two ω one is v=ω[ss]2[/ss]r another v=ω[ss]1[/ss](R-r) [/b] see the fig below...
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 2:43pm 18-03-09 |
|
#17 Posted 1:46pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[image]12864180.jpg[/image] there are two ω... and writing its energy... as far as i remember... writing this type of energy was discussed long back...
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 1:47pm 18-03-09 |
|
#18 Posted 2:23pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtswhat is this two ω's and nishant bhaiyya ... y not v=wr .. as ive written wrt COM.. wat abt the second question??
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#19 Posted 2:38pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsthe COM of ball is rotating about center of concave.... and ball is rolling..
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#20 Posted 2:43pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsand priyam .. y is v=w(R-r) and not v=wr .. is it bcz of the two w'??
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#21 Posted 2:44pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[b]as far as i remember... writing this type of energy was discussed long back... [/b] do u hav the link...
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#22 Posted 2:45pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsQ. 1.267 of erodov.. http://targetiit.com/iit_jee_forum/posts/30th_november_2008_762.html
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#23 Posted 2:48pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsand second waala?
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#24 Posted 2:51pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsQ.1 KE=(1/2)[(2/5)mr[p]2[/p]+m(R-r)[p]2[/p]]ω[ss]1[/ss][p]2[/p]+(1/2)[(2/5)mr[p]2[/p]+mr[p]2[/p]]ω[ss]2[/ss][p]2[/p] ω[ss]1[/ss]=v/(R-r) ω[ss]2[/ss]=v/r dθ/dt=ω[ss]1[/ss] and then write everything in terms of a and θ/(R-r)=x ... [12] well maybe...
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 5:49pm 18-03-09 |
|
#25 Posted 2:55pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[5][5][7][7] dimaag ke upar se flow kar gayaa.... plz thoda aur explanation de sekte ho.. priyam bhai... but i shudnt ask much .... cuz [hide]ur an emperor and emperors are known to be ruthless [3]
Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the lesson afterwards. |
|
#26 Posted 3:17pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsv=rw w' = angular velocity of COM of sphere w'=v/(R-r)= rw/R-r dw'/dt=r/R-r dw/dt alpha'=ralpha/R-r alpha= a/r a= gsinx/ 1+I/mr2 a=5gsinx/7 alpha' = 5grsinx/7(R-r) sinx=x alpha' = - 5grx/7(R-r) t=2pi√x/alpha' T=2pi√7(R-r)/5g
cet on 12th may |
|
#27 Posted 5:53pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsany one volunteer for energy method....[12]
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#28 Posted 7:11pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtswhy two omega?? still can't understand!! |
|
#29 Posted 9:53pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtswell dont get confused by apply too much energies (more energy => less stability) there will be translational energy and rotational energy = simple.. translational = mv[p]2[/p]/2 rotational = Iw[p]2[/p]/2=2/5 * mr[p]2[/p]w[p]2[/p]/2 =mv[p]2[/p]/5 (as v=wr for no sliding) further potential energy=mg(R-(R-r)cosθ) add them and differentiate u will get 7/5 mvdv/dt=-mgx(dθ/dt) here dθ/dt = v/R-r we get dv/dt=-5mgx/7(R-r)
All play and no work makes Rohan a full boy !. |
|
#30 Posted 10:02pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtshttp://targetiit.com/iit_jee_forum/posts/30th_november_2008_762.html [b]isme energy different kyun hai...??[/b] [i](more energy => less stability)[/i] this reason is not enough for removing an energy.... also... i think this is right... because... answer is matching the force method... But How its correct?
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 10:07pm 18-03-09 |
|
#31 Posted 10:16pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsI didnt specify it as a reason for removing energy ... energy is always translational + rotational
All play and no work makes Rohan a full boy !. |
|
#32 Posted 10:44pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtswhat about that post...
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#33 Posted 10:47pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsactually in the question it is mentioned that the mass m is small thus r<<R which gives that the contribution of velocity by w1 to all the points is almost same ... as analogous to the case in your link the r is not <<R so the velocity contribution of the w1 there is not same to each point .. so the case here becomes almost the approaching case of a mass tranlating with v
All play and no work makes Rohan a full boy !. |
|
#34 Posted 10:49pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsBut it is not approximation in force method... and answer is same... but I think i got something... plz see if it can be the reason... jsut wait for a sec.. don go ofline...
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#35 Posted 10:51pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubts[image]12896807.jpg[/image] In II (this question).. axis of rot of sphere is not being rotated with ω[ss]2[/ss] about a fixed point only translated....... so not that energy term But in I(that link) axis of rot is rotated also.....with ω[ss]2[/ss] about center as shown.. so that energy term is included in this case... [im]http://www.mylivesignature.com/signatures/54487/106/36F28B53D4635736C18695AB64D67B69.png[/im]
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com Edited on 02:43am 19-03-09 |
|
#36 Posted 11:03pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsyes abhishek i think thats the point well done :)
All play and no work makes Rohan a full boy !. |
|
#37 Posted 11:05pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsfinally... saam se paresaan the ispar.... :)
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
|
#38 Posted 11:07pm 18-03-09 Re: SHM doubtsyes that is indeed a great point to be noticed ...
All play and no work makes Rohan a full boy !. |
|
#39 Posted 1:56pm 05-04-09 Re: SHM doubtsiN REFERENCE TO # 29 [b][i]here dθ/dt = v/R-r[/i][/b] FRM WER DUS THIS CUM ?? |
|
#40 Posted 8:14pm 05-04-09 Re: SHM doubtsSee post#4 the theta is shown there. and post#17 w1=v/(R-r)
http://priyamsays.blogspot.com |
